Here we describe what we mean by a living economy, and what we intend by engaging with this issue. Zone: 2here Landscape: 1material Family: Home
# Decades of development The foprop project arose from decades of focus on the enecessity and possibility of alternative economy, commencing in the 70s with 'labour process' economy within neo-Marxism, emergent environmental issues (like 'limits to growth', energy consumption and exhaustion, and ecosystem destruction) in the radical technology field, and 'the real economy' of means of subsistence and wellbeing, as distinct from (in opposition to) matters of money, profit, exchange etc, which are secondary characteristics of capitalist economy: to be altered in the practice of making alternatives.
Everything is **practice**. We essentially are concerned with the producing and sustaining of formations of radical activist practice. The foprop narratives are narratives of activist living.
The work has come into its present focus here through a number of routes, including: - 'Robinistas' - Work of Robin Murray and associates - to be added xxx - Work on alternative economic regimes like the work described and promoted by JK Gibson-Graham and especially including feminist economics and recognitions of domestic labour, care work and invisible work - to be added xxx - Development of a new global focus on Politics of commoning and 'the insurgent power of the commons' - to be added xxx - Development of perspectives on Solidarity economy - to be added xxx; - The provisioning of Digital infrastructure in the commons - to be added xxx;]and - Grassroots economic alternatives - to be added xxx
# From economics to organising The characteristic focus of foprop is to engage not 'the economy' (and constellations of alternative economic practices) per se - as if 'it' was an entity or self-contained system - but the producing and sustaining of the formations of activists, who might be capable of producing a living economy: an actual working constellation of practices (with their cultures and aesthetics) under radically altered social relations. This is the characteristic foprop focus on Formación: a move **'from economics to organising'**.
# Alternatives? Altered! 'Alternatives' are dealt with in foprop by addressing the significantly altered relations of production, that are being embodied in actual material practice, as live forces of production. This dual focus, on forces and relations of production is what leads to the tag: foprop. Forces of production, relations of production - to be added xxx
# Living economy
'Living economy' is chosen here after working for a time with other terms. 'Social economy' was a framing used from the early noughties (as in 'the new social economy', or 'social and solidarity economy').
> Murray 2009, *Danger and opportunity - Crisis and the new social economy*, Nesta. pdf 
, downloaded March 2018. Links broken: a copy exists locally at assetspdf .
'Civil economy' is a term later adopted by Robin Murray in his 2012 article for the Global Civil Society Yearbook. It's 'civil' reference and its activist context is more politicised than the flabby 'social' of the 'social innovation' perspective.
> Murray 2012, 'Global Civil Society and the rise of the civil economy', Global Civil Society Yearbook, reprinted in *Opendemocracy* webpage. A copy is held locally at assetspdf
Solidarity economy - to be added xxx
'Living economy' is the term used by Robin Murray in his last recorded interview in 2016.
> Robin Murray 2016, 'Late environmental economist Robin Murray's views on creating a new economy', Upstream podcasts podcast , downloaded nov 2023. A partial transcript is held locally pdf
We use it here because: - It emphasises the centrality of living labour - practice - in the operation, orientation and making of 'the real economy'. - It resonates with climate crisis and the threatened status of species and ecosystems. - It contrasts with the dominance of 'dead labour' - capital sunk in technological means and in infrastructures.
In these terms, the rationale for selecting the tactical themes is thus. - The real economy - Could be represented by Wild commons, Domesticated economy or Digital means. Each of these is enormously siginificant. But Digital means is perhaps the most problematic. Wild commons - the ecosystems, climate systems and so on, of the planet - are subject to massive amounts of technical investigation, and are matters of deep public concern. Domesticated economy is the focus of very many alternative economic initiatives. But understanding the 'golemic' nature of digital infrastructure and tools is in its infancy, barely 30 years old. Yet digital stuff alredy causes chaos, confusion and concern on a huge scale. This warrants adopting Digital means as a thematic focus.
Next: Formación
DOT FROM preview-next-diagram STATIC strict digraph {rankdir=LR node [style=filled fillcolor=lightyellow penwidth=3 color=black fontname="Helvetica"] "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" node [style=filled fillcolor=lightblue] "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "A living economy" node [style=filled fillcolor=white] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=3 color=black] "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Pattern language(ng)" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "A college of conviviality" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Narrative frame" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Invitation - Nov 2023" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "A living economy" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Formación" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "An intention of justice" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "An aspiration for peace" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "A framework - The foprop weave" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Tactical selection of issues" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "Sources and inspirations" "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" -> "A living economy" node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] "Invitation - Nov 2023" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Formación work" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Commoning" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Dual power" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Digital means" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Aesthetic landscape" "Invitation - Nov 2023" -> "Rowbotham Segal Wainwright" node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] "A framework - The foprop weave" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Material landscape" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Cultural landscape" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Aesthetic landscape" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Care work" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Subsistence work" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Formación work" "A framework - The foprop weave" -> "Stewarding work" node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style=filled fillcolor=white penwidth=1 color=black] node [style="filled,rounded,dotted" fillcolor=white] edge [style=dotted] "Making the living economy - the foprop weave" "Welcome Visitors" -> "Making the living economy - the foprop weave"}